866-758-0031

Facebook

Instagram

Free Consultation
logo
Free Consultation
mobile logo
23 April
0 Comments
Sticky

What is a Threshold Injury? No-Fault Reform Provides Further Clarification

Posted by Steve and Tom Sinas
in Auto No-Fault, Motor Vehicle Crashes
man with arm injury working on laptop

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] Authored by Grand Rapids auto accident lawyer, Tom Sinas What is a threshold injury? If you've been injured in a motor vehicle collision, have heard this term tossed around, and are confused and wonder what it means, we have good and bad news. The bad news is, you're not alone. Threshold law has been the source of great debate in Michigan amongst practitioners and judges throughout the years. It seems that as soon as the courts settle on what constitutes a "serious impairment of body function," an appellate decision upends that definition. The good news, though, is that we seem...

Continue reading
20 April
0 Comments
Sticky

When Chaos Devolves into Anarchy: The Hot Mess of Public Acts 21 and 22

Posted by Steve and Tom Sinas
in Auto No-Fault
Pubc Acts 21 and 22 Michigan no-fault reform

Authored by Grand Rapids car crash lawyer, Tom Sinas Every parent knows that when a child makes a mess, the only thing worse than the mess itself is when the child tries to hastily clean it up. The net result is what some affectionately call a "hot mess." With the legislative overhaul of the no-fault law in 2019, also known as Public Acts 21 and 22, Michiganders are left with what can only be described as a hot mess. Priority Scheme Upended There is no better example than what has happened regarding the so-call "priority" scheme, i.e., the rules determining where an auto...

Continue reading
02 May
0 Comments
Sticky

Auto No-Fault Intentional Injuries Exclusion – You Don’t Have to Prove Innocence

Posted by Steve and Tom Sinas
in Auto No-Fault
knee-brace-injury

With limited exception, Michigan’s auto no-fault law generally provides every Michigan auto-accident victim with certain financial and medical insurance benefits that pay for accident-related medical care and other related expenses.  Generally, these benefits are payable regardless of whether the injured person claiming them was at fault for the accident. To use an extreme example, a person theoretically could crash their vehicle into a telephone pole while driving under the influence of marijuana or alcohol, with no sleep, while checking their Facebook account on their phone, and they will generally still receive no-fault benefits.  To be clear, we do not endorse or otherwise suggest...

Continue reading
30 November
0 Comments
Sticky

Steve Sinas Argues Out-of-State No-Fault Case at Michigan Supreme Court

Posted by Steve and Tom Sinas
in Auto No-Fault
Michigan-Supreme-Court-Hall-of-Justice

On November 19, 2018, Stephen Sinas argued an out-of-state no-fault case at Michigan Supreme Court. Sinas Dramis appellate attorney, Joel Finnell, took the leading role on the appellate briefing. The issue in the case was whether our clients, who are Michigan residents, could recover no-fault insurance benefits when they were injured in a motor vehicle crash that occurred in Florida. Furthermore, they occupied a vehicle purchased and used exclusively in Florida at the time of the accident. This vehicle was insured under a Florida insurance policy. However, our clients had no-fault insurance coverage that covered several vehicles they used in Michigan. Home-Owners Insurance Company...

Continue reading
01 February
0 Comments
Sticky

Extending Michigan’s “One-Year-Back Rule” Will Help Reduce No-Fault Litigation

Posted by lmurphy
in Auto No-Fault
no-fault-medical-bill

By Stephen H. Sinas As the Legislature debates revising the Auto No-Fault Insurance Act, there is one simple change that will vastly improve the no-fault system: extending Michigan's “one-year-back rule." If people have more time to resolve payment disputes with their auto insurance companies, it will help reduce unnecessary no-fault litigation. The one-year-back rule in MCL 500.3145 says that, for any medical expense unpaid by a no-fault insurance company, if a lawsuit is not filed against the insurance company within one year from the date the medical service was rendered, the insurance company will never have to pay the expense. This is...

Continue reading
24 January
0 Comments
Sticky

Can Victims Of Michigan Semi-Truck Crashes Get No-Fault Benefits?

Posted by lmurphy
in Auto No-Fault, Motor Vehicle Crashes, Semi-Trucks
michigan-semi-truck-crashes

Michigan semi-truck accidents are some of the deadliest accidents on the roadways. Every year, there are often over 10,000 heavy trucks and buses involved in collisions on Michigan highways. Nationwide, studies show that 98 percent of semi-truck crashes result in at least one fatality — and about 86 percent of these deaths are not the semi-truck driver. To help reduce fatalities, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration have proposed a “speed limiter” rule for new vehicles that weigh more than 26,000 pounds. Speed limiters would cap the speed of large vehicles at 60, 65 or 68...

Continue reading
18 December
0 Comments
Sticky

Coordinated No-Fault Benefits: No More Payment Delays For Medical Providers

Posted by lmurphy
in Auto No-Fault
medical-providers-no-fault-benefits

Michigan Court of Appeals decision makes it faster and easier for medical providers to claim PIP benefits under a coordinated no-fault policy.  In St. John Macomb Oakland Hospital v State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co (Docket No. 329056, issued 12/8/2016), the Court of Appeals held that medical providers are not required to appeal a health insurer’s denial of benefits before seeking payment of no-fault personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits for the services they've rendered. The St. John decision clarifies last year's ruling in Farm Bureau Ins Co v Blue Cross Blue Shield, 314 Mich App 12 (2015), where the Court said that,...

Continue reading
14 December
0 Comments
Sticky

What Is “Reasonable Proof” Under The Michigan No-Fault Act?

Posted by lmurphy
in Auto No-Fault
michigan-no-fault-act-reasonable-proof

Since being enacted more than 40 years ago, the Michigan No-Fault Act has been rather difficult to understand and apply. But despite the Act's overall complexities, there are some no-fault concepts that have retained their elegant simplicity -- and one of these is “reasonable proof." Under the Michigan No-Fault Act, an insurance company is required to pay personal protection insurance (PIP) claims within 30 days of receiving “reasonable proof of the fact and of the amount of loss sustained.” If an insurer fails to do this, it is liable for 12% annual penalty interest. Liability for penalty interest is strict and requires...

Continue reading
01 November
0 Comments
Sticky

Can You Get No-Fault Benefits & Damages In A Michigan Hit-And-Run Crash?

Posted by lmurphy
in Auto No-Fault, Fox 17
michigan-auto-accident-attorneys

No one ever anticipates being in a hit-and-run crash where the other driver flees the scene. If you're injured in a Michigan hit-and-run car accident, one crucial question is whether you're entitled to no-fault benefits to pay your medical bills, replacement services and any lost wages. Another important question is whether you can recover damages for your non-economic loss, like pain and suffering or loss of enjoyment, even though you don't know who hit your vehicle. No-Fault Benefits Under Michigan no-fault law, hit-and-run crash victims are treated like any other car accident victim. This means they are entitled to: allowable medical and rehabilitation...

Continue reading
27 June
0 Comments
Sticky

Sinas Dramis Attorneys Teach Students About Michigan Auto No-Fault Law

Posted by lmurphy
in Announcements, Auto No-Fault
auto-no-fault-insurance-policy

Michigan auto no-fault law is tricky to understand, especially given the legislative changes in recent years and the numerous court decisions interpreting the No-Fault Act. That is why Lansing auto accident lawyers George Sinas, Bryan Waldman and Stephen Sinas take time out of their busy schedules to teach soon-to-be attorneys at Michigan State University College of Law about Michigan auto no-fault law. The three attorneys, who are partners at the Sinas Dramis Law Firm in Lansing and Grand Rapids, have been adjunct professors at Michigan State University College of Law for several years. [caption id="attachment_5490" align="alignright" width="150"] Stephen Sinas[/caption] With six decades of...

Continue reading